ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Correlation between blood and lymphatic vessel density and results of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography
Publication date: 2015-10-23
Pol J Pathol 2015;66(3):310-322
KEYWORDS
contrast-enhanced spectral mammographytissue lymphangiogenesis and/or angiogenesisnormal breast tissuebenign breast diseaseinvasive breast carcinoma
ABSTRACT
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a novel technique used for detection of tumour vascularity by imaging the moment in which contrast, delivered to the lesion by blood vessels, leaks out of them, and flows out through lymphatic vessels.
In our study, we included 174 women for whom spectral mammography was performed for diagnostic purposes. The relationship between enhancement in CESM and blood vessel density (BVD), lymphatic vessel density (LVD) or the percentage of fields with at least one lymphatic vessel (distribution of podoplanin-positive vessels – DPV) and other related parameters was assessed in 55 cases. BVD, LVD and DPV were assessed immunohistochemically, applying podoplanin and CD31/CD34 as markers of lymphatic and blood vessels, respectively.
The sensitivity (in detection of malignant lesions) of CESM was 100%, while its specificity – 39%. We found a significant positive correlation between the intensity of enhancement in CESM and BVD (p = 0.007, r = 0.357) and a negative correlation between the intensity of enhancement in CESM and DPV (p = 0.003, r = –0.390). Lesions with the highest enhancement in CESM showed a high number of blood vessels and a low number of lymphatics.
Conclusions: 1) CESM is a method characterized by high sensitivity and acceptable specificity; 2) the correlation between CESM results and blood/lymphatic vessel density confirms its utility in detection of tissue angiogenesis and/or lymphangiogenesis.
In our study, we included 174 women for whom spectral mammography was performed for diagnostic purposes. The relationship between enhancement in CESM and blood vessel density (BVD), lymphatic vessel density (LVD) or the percentage of fields with at least one lymphatic vessel (distribution of podoplanin-positive vessels – DPV) and other related parameters was assessed in 55 cases. BVD, LVD and DPV were assessed immunohistochemically, applying podoplanin and CD31/CD34 as markers of lymphatic and blood vessels, respectively.
The sensitivity (in detection of malignant lesions) of CESM was 100%, while its specificity – 39%. We found a significant positive correlation between the intensity of enhancement in CESM and BVD (p = 0.007, r = 0.357) and a negative correlation between the intensity of enhancement in CESM and DPV (p = 0.003, r = –0.390). Lesions with the highest enhancement in CESM showed a high number of blood vessels and a low number of lymphatics.
Conclusions: 1) CESM is a method characterized by high sensitivity and acceptable specificity; 2) the correlation between CESM results and blood/lymphatic vessel density confirms its utility in detection of tissue angiogenesis and/or lymphangiogenesis.
REFERENCES (42)
1.
Vermeulen PB, Gasparini G, Fox SB, et al. Quantification of angiogenesis in solid human tumours: an international consensus on the methodology and criteria of evaluation. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A: 2474-2484.
2.
Weidner N, Folkman J, Pozza F, et al. Tumor angiogenesis: a new significant and independent prognostic indicator in early-stage breast carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 1875-1887.
3.
Mylona E, Nomikos A, Alexandrou P, et al. Lymphatic and blood vessel morphometry in invasive breast carcinomas: relation with proliferation and VEGF-C and -D proteins expression. Histol Histopathol 2007; 22: 825-835.
4.
Tsutsui S, Matsuyama A, Yamamoto M, et al. The Akt expression correlates with the VEGF-A and -C expression as well as the microvessel and lymphatic vessel density in breast cancer. Oncol Rep 2010; 23: 621-630.
5.
El-Gohary YM, Metwally G, Saad RS, et al. Prognostic significance of intratumoral and peritumoral lymphatic density and blood vessel density in invasive breast carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 2008; 129: 578-586.
6.
Mohammed RA, Ellis IO, Elsheikh S, et al. Lymphatic and angiogenic characteristics in breast cancer: morphometric analysis and prognostic implications. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2009; 113: 261-273.
7.
Mohammed RA, Ellis IO, Mahmmod AM, et al. Lymphatic and blood vessels in basal and triple-negative breast cancers: characteristics and prognostic significance. Mod Pathol 2011; 24: 774-785.
8.
Yuan F, Dellian M, Fukumura D, et al. Vascular permeability in a human tumor xenograft: molecular size dependence and cutoff size. Cancer Res 1995; 55: 3752-3756.
9.
Yuan F, Leunig M, Huang SK, et al. Microvascular permeability and interstitial penetration of sterically stabilized (stealth) liposomes in a human tumor xenograft. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 3352-3356.
10.
Bosman FT, Havenith M, Cleutjens JP. Basement membranes in cancer. Ultrastruct Pathol 1985; 8: 291-304.
11.
Dellian M, Yuan F, Trubetskoy VS, et al. Vascular permeability in a human tumour xenograft: molecular charge dependence. Br J Cancer 2000; 82: 1513-1518.
12.
Wang J, Guo Y, Wang B, et al. Lymphatic microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor-C and -D as prognostic factors in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Mol Biol Rep 2012; 39: 11153-11165.
13.
van der Schaft DW, Pauwels P, Hulsmans S, et al. Absence of lymphangiogenesis in ductal breast cancer at the primary tumor site. Cancer Lett 2007; 254: 128-136.
14.
Zhang XH, Huang DP, Guo GL, et al. Coexpression of VEGF-C and COX-2 and its association with lymphangiogenesis in human breast cancer. BMC Cancer 2008; 8: 4.
15.
Gu Y, Qi X, Guo S. Lymphangiogenesis induced by VEGF-C and VEGF-D promotes metastasis and a poor outcome in breast carcinoma: a retrospective study of 61 cases. Clin Exp Metastasis 2008; 25: 717-725.
16.
Forsberg F, Goldberg BB, Merritt CR, et al. Diagnosing breast lesions with contrast-enhanced 3-dimensional power Doppler imaging. J Ultrasound Med 2004; 23: 173-182.
17.
Moon WK, Im JG, Noh DY, Han MC. Nonpalpable breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US and a microbubble contrast agent-initial experience. Radiology 2000; 217: 240-246.
18.
Yang WT, Tse GM, Lam PK, et al. Correlation between color power Doppler sonographic measurement of breast tumor vasculature and immunohistochemical analysis of microvessel density for the quantitation of angiogenesis. J Ultrasound Med 2002; 21: 1227-1235.
19.
Yang WT, Metreweli C, Lam PK, Chang J. Benign and malignant breast masses and axillary nodes: evaluation with echo-enhanced color power Doppler US. Radiology 2001; 220: 795-802.
20.
Izzatto G, Chersevani RRG. Contrast media in ultrasonography basic principles and clinical applications. 1st ed. Quaia E (ed.). Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.
21.
Liu H, Jiang YX, Liu JB, et al. Contrast-enhanced breast ultrasonography: imaging features with histopathologic correlation. J Ultrasound Med 2009; 28: 911-920.
22.
Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995; 196: 115-122.
23.
Berg WA, Gutierrez L, NessAiver MS, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer. Radiology 2004; 233: 830-849.
24.
Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK, et al. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 1295-1303.
25.
Hollingsworth AB, Stough RG, O’Dell CA, Brekke CE. Breast magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative locoregional staging. Am J Surg 2008; 196: 389-397.
26.
Dromain C, Thibault F, Muller S, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 565-574.
27.
Dromain C, Balleyguier C, Muller S, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: W528-537.
28.
Poellinger A, El-Ghannam S, Diekmann S, et al. Correlation between enhancement characteristics of MR mammography and capillary density of breast lesions. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83: 2129-2136.
29.
Teifke A, Behr O, Schmidt M, et al. Dynamic MR imaging of breast lesions: correlation with microvessel distribution pattern and histologic characteristics of prognosis. Radiology 2006; 239: 351-360.
30.
Tuncbilek N, Unlu E, Karakas HM, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance mammography. Breast J 2003; 9: 403-408.
31.
Niemiec JA, Adamczyk A, Ambicka A, et al. Triple-negative, basal marker-expressing, and high-grade breast carcinomas are characterized by high lymphatic vessel density and the expression of podoplanin in stromal fibroblasts. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2014; 22: 10-16.
32.
Niemiec J, Adamczyk A, Ambicka A, et al. Lymphangiogenesis assessed using three methods is related to tumour grade, breast cancer subtype and expression of basal marker. Pol J Pathol 2012; 63: 165-171.
33.
Niemiec J, Sas-Korczynska B, Harazin-Lechowska A, et al. Lymphatic and blood vessels in male breast cancer. Anticancer Res 2015; 35: 1041-1048.
34.
El-Gendi S, Abdel-Hadi M. Lymphatic vessel density as prognostic factor in breast carcinoma: relation to clinicopathologic parameters. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2009; 21: 139-149.
35.
Jochelson M. Advanced imaging techniques for the detection of breast cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol 2012; 65-69.
36.
Cheung YC, Lin YC, Wan YL, et al. Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis. Eur Radiol 2014; 24: 2394-2403.
37.
Luczyńska E, Heinze-Paluchowska S, Dyczek S, et al. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: comparison with conventional mammography and histopathology in 152 women. Korean J Radiol 2014; 15: 689-696.
38.
Łuczyńska E, Heinze-Paluchowska S, Hendrick E, et al. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography. Med Sci Monit 2015; 21: 1358-1367.
39.
Niemiec JA, Adamczyk A, Ambicka A, et al. Distribution of podoplanin-positive tumor vessels predicts disease-specific survival of node-positive breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. Cancer Invest 2014; 32: 168-177.
40.
Nakamura Y, Yasuoka H, Tsujimoto M, et al. Lymph vessel density correlates with nodal status, VEGF-C expression, and prognosis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005; 91: 125-132.
41.
Pusztaszeri MP, Seelentag W, Bosman FT. Immunohistochemical expression of endothelial markers CD31, CD34, von Willebrand factor, and Fli-1 in normal human tissues. J Histochem Cytochem 2006; 54: 385-395.
42.
Sauter B, Foedinger D, Sterniczky B, et al. Immunoelectron microscopic characterization of human dermal lymphatic microvascular endothelial cells. Differential expression of CD31, CD34, and type IV collagen with lymphatic endothelial cells vs blood capillary endothelial cells in normal human skin. J Histochem Cytochem 1998; 46: 165-176.
| eISSN: | 2084-9869 |
| ISSN: | 1233-9687 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
