ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Insight into the history of anatomopathological museums – Part 1. From casual assemblages to scientific collections
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of History and Philosophy of Medical Science, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
 
2
Department of Pathology and Neuropathology, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
 
3
Department of Pathomorphology, COPERNICUS, Gdańsk, Poland
 
 
Submission date: 2016-03-15
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-05-09
 
 
Publication date: 2016-11-25
 
 
Corresponding author
Piotr Paluchowski   

Department of History and Philosophy of Medical Science Medical University of Gdańsk, Tuwima 15 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
 
 
Pol J Pathol 2016;67(3):207-215
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
We present a short history of anatomopathological museums in Europe. In the first part we provide an insight into the beginnings from the Renaissance until the middle of the 19th century. We assess forms of acquisition and exhibition of the specimens concerning the steps of medicine and pathology development. The prototypes were “curiosities of nature” collections starting in the 15th century. The next milestone collections focusing on the human body were those of Frederik Ruysch in the Netherlands (17th century). In the 18th century teachers in surgical and anatomical schools realized the educational power of such collections. Anatomopathology as a separate medical discipline was developing in parallel. At that time museums such as the one established by Honoré Fragonard in Paris, the Hunterian in Glasgow and Narrenturm in Vienna were created. At Polish universities in Cracow and Vilnius, such museums were beginning to emerge at the beginning of the 19th century. Anatomopathological collections became more popular, gathering specimens: osteological, dry and mummified, as well as wet – embedded in alcohol, formalin, and mysterious mixtures. They provide a wealth of important data for scientific, medical, historical and even ethical areas, as well as methods and concepts of conservation and even recreation of human body parts.
REFERENCES (48)
1.
Encyclopºdia Britannica, Inc., http://www.britannica.com/topi... 24.01.2016.
 
2.
Ferrari L, Coda R, Fulcheri E, et al. Ruolo del Museo di Anatomia Patologica: glorie passate, crisi attuale e prospettive future. Pathologica (Genoa) 2001; 93: 196-200.
 
3.
Fulcheri E. I musei di anatomia patologica: un settore troppo trascurato della museologia scientifica, degno di riconsiderazione. Pathologica 1996; 88: 291-296.
 
4.
The Origins of Museums: The Cabinets of Curiosities in Sixteenth- and Seventeenth-Century Europe, ed. Oliver Impey and Arthur MacGregor, 2001.
 
5.
Shackelford J. Documenting the factual and the artifactual: Ole Worm and public knowledge. Endeavour 1999; 2: 65-71.
 
6.
Jaussaud P. The curiosities of three apothecaries. Rev Hist Pharm (Paris) 2003; 51: 603-610.
 
7.
Albertus Seba. Cabinet of Natural Curiosities. Musch I, et al. TASCHEN Gmbh; 25th edition. 2008.
 
8.
Gulczyński J, Iżycka-Świeszewska E. Gabinety i zbiory osobliwości jako pierwsze muzea anatomii, anatomii patologicznej oraz historii naturalnej. In: Dawna medycyna weterynaryjna: pacjent. Felsmann MZ, Szarko J, Felsmann M (eds.). Muzeum Ziemi Chełmińskiej w Chełmnie, Chełmno 2011; 483-504.
 
9.
Purc-Stępniak B. Sekcje zwłok i demonstracje medyczne w malarstwie i grafice europejskiej od XVI do XVIII wieku. In: Joachim Oelhaf i jego następcy. Szarszewski A, Siek B (eds.). Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny, Gdańsk 2013; 111-139.
 
10.
Gulczyński J, Iżycka-Świeszewska E, Grzybiak M. Short history of the autopsy. Part 1. From prehistory to the middle of the 16th century. Pol J Pathol 2009; 60: 109-111.
 
11.
Ellis H. Andreas Vesalius: father of modern anatomy. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2014; 75: 711.
 
12.
Gulczyński J, Iżycka-Świeszewska E, Grzybiak M. Short history of autopsy. Part 2. From the second half of the 16th century to contemporary times. Pol J Pathol 2010; 61: 169-175.
 
13.
Ruysch F. Museum anatomicum Ruyschianum, sive catalogus rariorum quae in Authoris aedibus asservantur. Janssonio-Waesbergios, Amstelodami 1721 (2nd edition).
 
14.
Knoeff R. Touching anatomy: On the handling of preparations in the anatomical cabinets of Frederik Ruysch (1638-1731). Stud Hist Philos Bio Biomed Sci 2015; 49: 32-44.
 
15.
Hansen JV. Resurrecting Death: Anatomical Art in the Cabinet of Dr. Frederik Ruysch. The Art Bulletin 1996; 78: 663-679.
 
16.
Mirilas P, Lainas P, Panutsopulos D, et al. The monarch and the master – Peter the Great and Frederik Ruysch. Arch Surg 2006; 141: 602-606.
 
17.
Muller-Dietz HE. Anatomische Praparate in der Petersburg „Kunstkammer”. Zentralblatt für Allgemeine Pathologie und Pathologische Anatomie 1989; 135: 757-767.
 
18.
Franke H. Peter der Grosse und die anatomo-pathologische Praparatesammlung von F. Ruysch. Munch Med Wochenschr 1950; 113: 488-491.
 
19.
The University of Glasgow, http://www.hunterian.gla.ac.uk... 24.01.2016.
 
20.
Keppie L William Hunter and Hunterian Museum in Glasgow 1807-2007. University Press, Edinburgh 2007; 7-18.
 
21.
Keppie L. The Hunterian collection and its Museum. J Hist Collections 2014; 26: 355-362.
 
22.
Lakhani S. Early clinical pathologists 4: John Hunter (1728-1793). J Clin Pathol 1991; 44: 621-623.
 
23.
Carter R. John Hunter, 1728-1793. World J Surg 1993; 17: 563-565.
 
24.
Degueurce C. The Celebrated Ecorches of Honore Fragonard, Part 1: The Classical Techniques of Preparation of Dry Anatomical Specimens in the 18th Century. Clin Anat 2010; 23: 249.
 
25.
Simon J. The Theater of Anatomy: The Anatomical Preparations of Honore Fragonard. Eighteenth-Century Studies 2002; 36: 63-79.
 
26.
Baljet B, Oostra RJ. Historical aspects of the study of malformations in the Netherlands. Am J Med Genet 1998; 77: 95-97.
 
27.
Oostra RJ, Baljet B, Dijkstra PF, et al. Congenital anomalies in the teratological collection of Museum Vrolik in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. I: Syndromes with multiple congenital anomalies. Am J Med Genet 1998; 77: 100-115.
 
28.
Surgeons’ Hall Museums http://www.museum.rcsed.ac.uk 24.01.2016.
 
29.
Institut für Anatomie und Zellbiologie – Halle. http://www.meckelschesammlunge... 28.01.2016.
 
30.
Opitz J M, Schultka R, Göbbel L. Meckel on developmental pathology. Am J Med Genet A 2006; 140A: 115-128.
 
31.
Hermann von Helmholtz-Zentrum für Kulturtechnik, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, http://www.universitaetssammlu... 28.01.2016.
 
32.
Schwarz S. Die anatomische Privatsammlung der Anatomenfamilie Meckel unter besonderer Berücksichtigung ihres präparationstechnischen Profils. http://sundoc.bibliothek.uni-h....
 
33.
Janjua M, Schultka R, Goebbel L, et al. The legacy of Johann Friedrich Meckel the Elder (1724-1774): a 4-generation dynasty of anatomists. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: 758-770.
 
34.
Patzak B, Winter E, Feigl W. Lorenz Biermayer und die Entstehung der Pathologisch-anatomischen Sammlung im Wiener Narrenturm. Wien Med Wochenschr 2013; 163: 310-315.
 
35.
Szarszewski A, Bogotko-Szarszewska M. Auditorium Anatomicum and Theatrum Anatomicum in Gdansk. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 2014; 73: 239-246.
 
36.
Iżycka-Świeszewska E, Hermann B, Gulczyński J. Johann Adam Kulmus i publiczna sekcja zwłok bliźniąt zrośniętych w 1724 roku. W: Joachim Oelhaf i jego następcy. Szarszewski A, Siek B (red.). Gdański Uniwersytet Medyczny, Gdańsk 2013; 83-91.
 
37.
Katedra Anatomii Uniwersytet Jagielloński, http://www.katedra-anatomii.cm....
 
38.
Messbarger R. The Lady Anatomist: The Life and Work of Anna Morandi Manzolini. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2010.
 
39.
Riva A, Conti G, Solinas P, et al. The evolution of anatomical illustration and wax modelling in Italy from the 16th to early 19th centuries. J Anat 2010; 216: 209-222.
 
40.
Dacome L. Waxworks and the performance of anatomy in mid-18th-century Italy. Endeavour 2006; 30: 29-35.
 
41.
Märker A. The anatomical models of La Specola: production, uses, and reception. Nuncius 2006; 21: 295-321.
 
42.
Ballestriero R. Anatomical models and wax Venuses: art masterpieces or scientific craft works? J Anat 2010; 216: 223-234.
 
43.
Chen JC, Amar AP, Levy, ML, et al. The development of anatomic art and sciences: The ceroplastica anatomic models of La Specola. Neurosurgery 1999; 45: 883-891.
 
44.
Nesi G, Santi R, Taddei G. Art and the teaching of pathological anatomy at the University of Florence since the nineteenth century. Virchows Archiv 2009; 455: 15-19.
 
45.
Gryglewski RW. Rozwój krakowskiej kolekcji anatomopatologicznej w XIX stuleciu. Przegl Lek 2013; 70: 997-1001.
 
46.
Grmek M. The history of medical education in Russia. In: The History of Medical Education. O’Malley CD (ed.). University of California Press, Berkeley 1970; 313.
 
47.
Baliński M. Opisanie statystyczne miasta Wilna. Józef Zawadzki, Wilno 1835; 86-88.
 
48.
Sabat D. The historical outline of Vilnius pathological anatomy in the first half of the 19th century. Pol J Pathol 2004; 55: 75-81.
 
eISSN:2084-9869
ISSN:1233-9687
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top