ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Is the inflammation process absolutely absent in tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon? Histopathologic study of the long head of the biceps tendon after arthroscopic treatment
More details
Hide details
Submission date: 2017-04-01
Acceptance date: 2017-07-08
Publication date: 2018-03-06
Pol J Pathol 2017;68(4):318-325
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon is a difficult medical issue. Its pathogenesis and etiology is multifactorial and unclear. Tendinopathy is thought to be primarily degenerative in nature, as tendons are characterized by impaired regeneration and healing. Thirty–five patients with preoperatively diagnosed tendinopathy of long head of the biceps tendon were referred to the Orthopedics Department. All patients underwent an arthroscopic–assisted biceps tenodesis or tenotomy. The intra-articular portion of the long head of the biceps tendon was obtained from each of the patients who underwent arthroscopy. A macroscopic and microscopic evaluation of biceps tendon samples revealed degeneration among all specimens. This study demonstrates the prevalence of the degeneration process and the presence of marginal inflammation process in tendinopathy of the long head of biceps tendon. The role, that inflammation process plays in tendinopathy is important in the early phase and gradually becomes secondary to the developing degeneration. The inflammatory cells, occasionally seen in pathological tendons, could be an evidence of re–injury and recent healing response.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Riley G. Tendinopathy-from basic science to treatment. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2008; 4: 82-89.
2.
Joseph M, Maresh CM, McCarthy MB, et al. Histological and Molecular Analysis of the Biceps Tendon Long Head Post-Tenotomy. J Orthop Res 2009; 27: 1379-1385.
3.
Zabrzyński J, Zabrzyńska A, Grzanka D. Tendinopathy – a disease of tendons. The Journal of Orthopaedics Trauma Surgery and Related Research 2016; 3: 024-030.
4.
Riley G. The pathogenesis of tendinopathy. A molecular perspective. Rheumatology 2004; 43: 131-142.
5.
Rees JD, Wilson AM, Wolman RL. Current concepts in the management of tendon disorders. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 508-521.
6.
Zabrzyński J, Szumlański A. Tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon–physical examination confronted with shoulder arthroscopy findings. Med Biol Sci 2016; 30: 67-72.
7.
Ahrens PM, Boileau P. The long head of biceps and associated tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89: 1001-1009.
8.
Maffulli N, Longo UG, Franceschi F, et al. Movin and Bonar Scores Assess the Same Characteristics of Tendon Histology. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2008; 466: 1605-1611.
9.
Singaraju VM, Kang RW, Yanke AB, et al. Biceps tendinitis in chronic rotator cuff tears: A histologic perspective. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2008; 17: 898-904.
10.
Streit JJ, Shishani Y, Rodgers M, et al. Tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps tendon: histopathologic analysis of the extra-articular biceps tendon and tenosynovium. Open Access J Sports Med 2015; 6: 63-70.
11.
Järvinen M, Józsa M, Kannus P, et al. Histopathological findings in chronic tendon disorders. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7: 86-95.
12.
Paavola M, Kannus P, Järvinen T, et al. Achilles Tendinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84: 2062-2076.
13.
Khan KM, Cook JL, Bonar F et al. Histopathology of common tendinopathies. Update and implications for clinical management. Sports Med 1999; 27: 393-408.
14.
Abate M, Silbernagel KG, Siljeholm C, et al. Pathogenesis of tendinopathies: inflammation or degeneration. Arthritis Res Ther 2009; 11: 235.
15.
Tuite DJ, Renström PA, O’Brien M. The aging tendon. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997; 7: 72-7.
16.
Movin T, Gad A, Reinholt F, et al. Tendon pathology inlong-standing achillodynia. Biopsy findings in 40 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68: 170-175.
17.
Cook J, Feller J, Bonar S, et al. Abnormal tenocyte morphology is more prevalent than collagen disruption in asymptomatic athletes’ patellar tendons. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 334-338.
18.
Schubert TE, Weidler C, Lerch K, et al. Achilles tendinosis is associated with sprouting of substance P positive nerve fibres. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 1083-1086.
19.
Rees JD, Stride M, Scott A. Tendons-time to revisit inflammation. Br J Sports Med 2014; 48: 1553-1557.
20.
Murthi AM, Vosburgh CL, Neviaser TJ. The incidence of pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 2000; 9: 382-385.
21.
Longo UG, Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, et al. Characteristics at haematoxylin and eosin staining of ruptures of the long head of the biceps tendon. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 603-607.
22.
Almekinders LC, Temple JD. Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of tendonitis: an analysis of the literature. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1183-1190.
23.
Fenwick SA, Hazleman BL, Riley GP. The vasculature and its role in the damaged and healing tendon. Arthritis Res 2002; 4: 252-260.
24.
Kuncewicz E, Samborski W. The current state of knowledge about pathomechanism of tennis elbow. Ann Acad Med Stetin 2008; 54: 48-52.
25.
Scott A, Danielson P. An Emerging Role for Angiogenesis in Tendinopathy. European Musculoskeletal Review 2009; 4: 75-76.
26.
Alfredson H, Ohberg L, Forsgren S. Is vasculo-neural ingrowth the cause of pain in chronic Achilles tendinosis? An investigation using ultrasonography and colour Doppler, immunohistochemistry, and diagnostic injections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11: 334-338.