ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Morphologic evaluation of the effect of denosumab on giant cell tumors of bone and a new grading scheme
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2016-03-20
 
 
Final revision date: 2016-08-24
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-08-26
 
 
Publication date: 2017-02-10
 
 
Pol J Pathol 2016;67(4):392-397
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Giant cell tumor (GCT) is a rare, usually benign but locally aggressive neoplasm. Recent studies suggest new approaches in light of the elucidation of molecular pathways in bone. The osteolytic nature of GCT is caused by the receptor for activating nuclear factor-kB ligand (RANKL) associated osteoclasts. Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody that affects GCT through RANKL and it prevents normal and neoplastic osteolysis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the histopathologic alterations due to denosumab treatment and the efficiency of this drug in GCT therapy.
Ten patients had been treated with denosumab and were included in the study. Pretreatment biopsies were interpreted as conventional GCTs and posttreatment biopsies of the ten patients’ GCTs were classified in accordance with the grading system. Only one patient had tumor remaining after treatment.
There is limited data on histopathologic alterations that follow denosumab treatment. The bone pathologist should keep these changes in mind because they mimic different types of bone tumors. Furthermore, there is no widely accepted grading system to evaluate the effect of denosumab in GCT. Our study suggested a scheme that would be helpful to evaluate the efficiency of denosumab treatment in GCT.
REFERENCES (20)
1.
Mendenhall WM, Zlotecki RA, Scarborough MT, et al. Giant cell tumor of bone. Am J Clin Oncol 2006; 29: 96-99.
 
2.
Huang L, Xu J, Wood DJ, et al. Gene expression of osteoprotegerin ligand, osteoprotegerin, and receptor activator of NF-kappaB in giant cell tumor of bone: possible involvement in tumor cell-induced osteoclast-like cell formation. Am J Pathol 2000; 156: 761-767.
 
3.
FDA Approval for Denosumab. [Cited 2013 June 13]. Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/about-c....
 
4.
Athanasios AD, Toulis KA, Polyzos SA, et al. Long-term treatment of osteoporosis: safety and efficacy appraisal of denosumab. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2012; 8: 295-306.
 
5.
Hanley DA, Adachi JD, Bell A, Brown V. Denosumab: mechanism of action and clinical outcomes. Int J Clin Pract 2012; 66: 1139-1146.
 
6.
Agarwal A, Larsen BT, Buadu LD, et al. Denosumab chemotherapy for recurrent giant-cell tumor of bone: a case report of neoadjuvant use enabling complete surgical resection. Case Rep Oncol Med 2013; 2013: 496351.
 
7.
Chakarun CJ, Forrester DM, Gottsegen CJ, et al. Giant cell tumor of bone: review, mimics, and new developments in treatment. Radiographics 2013; 33: 197-211.
 
8.
Miller PD. A review of the efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a review. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2011; 3: 271-282.
 
9.
Rachner TD, Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Now and the future. Lancet 2011; 377: 1276-1287.
 
10.
Dorfman Howard D. Molecular biology of bone tumors. In: Dorfman Howard D (1st eds.) Bone Tumors. Mosby, Inc, St Louis, Missouri 1997; 56-76.
 
11.
Lippuner K. The future of osteoporosis treatment – a research update. Swiss Med Wkly 2012; 142: w13624.
 
12.
Hakozaki M, Tajino T, Yamada H, et al. Radiological and pathological characteristics of giant cell tumor of bone treated with denosumab. Diagn Pathol 2014; 9: 111.
 
13.
Watanabe N, Matsumoto S, Shimoji T, et al. Early evaluation of the therapeutic effect of denosumab on tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b expression in a giant cell tumor of bone: a case report. BMC Research Notes 2014; 7: 608.
 
14.
Santosh N, Mayerson JL, Iwenofu OH. Pseudosarcomatous spindle cell proliferation with osteoid matrix mimicking osteosarcoma: a distinct histologic phenotype in giant cell tumor of bone following denosumab therapy. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2016; 24: e18-e19.
 
15.
Heijden L, Sande M, Hogendoorn P, et al. Neoadjuvant denosumab for extensive giant cell tumor in os ischium – a case report. Acta Orthopaedica 2015; 86: 393-395.
 
16.
Matcuk G, Patel DB, Schein AJ, , et al. Giant cell tumor: rapid recurrence after cessation of long-term denosumab therapy. Skeletal Radiol 2015; 44: 1027-1031.
 
17.
Chawla S, Henshaw R, Seeger L, et al. Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 901-908.
 
18.
Dietrich MF, Cavuoti D, Landay M, Arriaga YE. Histological regression of giant cell tumor of bone following RANK ligand inhibition. J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep 2014; 2: 2324709614560216.
 
19.
Branstetter DG, Nelson SD, Manivel C, et al. Denosumab induces tumor reduction and bone formation in patients with giant cell tumor of bone. Clin Cancer Res 2012; 18: 4415-4424.
 
20.
Girolami I, Mancini I, Simoni A, et al. Denosumab treated giant cell tumour of bone: a morphological, immunohistochemical and molecular analysis of a series. J Clin Pathol 2016; 69: 240-247.
 
eISSN:2084-9869
ISSN:1233-9687
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top