ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Plasma biopsy by Tag-sequencing: an acceptable alternative to tumor tissue profiling in non-small-cell lung cancer
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Laboratory and Transfusion Services and Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, India
2
Molecular Laboratory, Department of Laboratory and Transfusion Services, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, India
3
Department of Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, India
Submission date: 2020-06-18
Final revision date: 2021-04-24
Acceptance date: 2021-06-06
Publication date: 2021-09-30
Pol J Pathol 2021;72(2):117-125
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Tag-sequencing is a modified next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach wherein targeted regions are tagged with unique molecular identifiers enabling error-free detection of rare genomic alterations. We aimed to perform this high-
fidelity sequencing to identify actionable variants from the plasma of lung cancer patients.
Targeted sequencing was performed from plasma-derived cell-free nucleic acid in twenty-one advanced, treatment naïve, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Clinically significant genetic alterations were compared with matched tumor NGS profile for each patient (patient-level), and separately for each alteration (variant-level). Cross-platform validation was done for EGFR and KRAS mutations (real-time PCR) and ALK1 rearrangement (immunohistochemistry).
Forty-seven alterations (26 in plasma and 21 in tumor tissue) were detected in 19/21 tested cases. Overall-concordance between the two assays was 94.87%
(κ of 0.71, 95% CI: 0.54-0.89). Patient-level and genic-concordance was 57.1% (12/21 cases) and 67.86%, respectively. Almost perfect agreement was reached for detecting actionable EGFR mutations and ALK1 rearrangement (κ of 0.89 and
κ of 1, respectively), which was confirmed by single-gene testing.
Substantial agreement between the assays makes Tag-sequencing a viable option for identifying multibiomarkers from the plasma of advanced NSCLC patients in special circumstances where tissue has depleted/tumor is inaccessible/high risk of biopsy due to existing comorbidities.
REFERENCES (29)
1.
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2018; 68: 394-424.
2.
Kris MG, Johnson BE, Berry LD, et al. Using multiplexed assays of oncogenic drivers in lung cancers to select targeted drugs. JAMA 2014; 311: 1998-2006.
3.
Vestergaard HH, Christensen MR, Lassen UN. A systematic review of targeted agents for non-small cell lung cancer. Acta Oncol 2018; 57: 176-186.
4.
Jahr S, Hentze H, Englisch S, et al. DNA fragments in the blood plasma of cancer patients: quantitations and evidence for their origin from apoptotic and necrotic cells. Cancer Res 2001; 61: 1659-1665.
5.
Diaz LA, Jr., Bardelli A. Liquid biopsies: genotyping circulating tumor DNA. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32: 579-586.
6.
Kukita Y, Matoba R, Uchida J, et al. High-fidelity target sequencing of individual molecules identified using barcode sequences: de novo detection and absolute quantitation of mutations in plasma cell-free DNA from cancer patients. DNA Res 2015; 22: 269-277.
7.
Volik S, Alcaide M, Morin RD, et al. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA): Clinical Significance and Utility in Cancer Shaped By Emerging Technologies. Mol Cancer Res 2016; 14: 898-908.
8.
Mehta A, Vasudevan S, Sharma SK, et al. Biomarker testing for advanced lung cancer by next-generation sequencing; a valid method to achieve a comprehensive glimpse at mutational landscape. Applied Cancer Research 2020; 40: doi.org/10.1186/s41241-020-00089-8.
9.
Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, et al. VarSome: the human genomic variant search engine. Bioinformatics 2019; 35: 1978-1980.
10.
Chakravarty D, Gao J, Phillips SM, et al. OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base. JCO Precis Oncol 2017; 2017: doi: 10.1200/PO.17.00011.
11.
Chae YK, Davis AA, Carneiro BA, et al. Concordance between genomic alterations assessed by next-generation sequencing in tumor tissue or circulating cell-free DNA. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 65364-65373.
12.
Tran LS, Pham HT, Tran VU, et al. Ultra-deep massively parallel sequencing with unique molecular identifier tagging achieves comparable performance to droplet digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA from lung cancer patients. PloS One 2019; 14: e0226193.
13.
Luca DG, Lastraioli S, Conte R, et al. Performance of the OncomineTM Lung cfDNA Assay for Liquid Biopsy by NGS of NSCLC Patients in Routine Laboratory Practice. Appl Sci 2020; 10: doi.org/10.3390/app10082895.
14.
Heeke S, Hofman V, Ilié M, et al. Prospective evaluation of NGS-based liquid biopsy in untreated late stage non-squamous lung carcinoma in a single institution. J Transl Med 2020; 18: doi.org/10.1186/s12967-020-02259-215.
15.
Veldore VH, Choughule A, Routhu T, et al. Validation of liquid biopsy: plasma cell-free DNA testing in clinical management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer (Auckl) 2018; 9: 1-11.
16.
Steendam CMJ, Atmodimedjo P, de Jonge E, et al. Plasma Cell-Free DNA Testing of Patients With EGFR Mutant Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Droplet Digital PCR Versus Next-Generation Sequencing Compared With Tissue-Based Results. JCO Precis Oncol 2019; doi: 10.1200/PO.18.00401.
17.
Ackerman A, Goldstein MA, Kobayashi S, et al. EGFR delE709_T710insD: a rare but potentially EGFR inhibitor responsive mutation in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 2012; 7: e19-20.
18.
Martelli MP, Sozzi G, Hernandez L, et al. EML4-ALK rearrangement in non-small cell lung cancer and non-tumor lung tissues. Am J Pathol 2009; 174: 661-670.
19.
Shaw AT, Yeap BY, Mino-Kenudson M, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer who harbor EML4-ALK. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4247-4253.
20.
Conklin CM, Craddock KJ, Have C, et al. Immunohistochemistry is a reliable screening tool for identification of ALK rearrangement in non-small-cell lung carcinoma and is antibody dependent. J Thorac Oncol 2013; 8: 45-51.
21.
Schneider F, Smith MA, Lane MC, et al. Adequacy of core needle biopsy specimens and fine-needle aspirates for molecular testing of lung adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 2015; 143: 193-200.
22.
Canon J, Rex K, Saiki AY, et al. The clinical KRAS(G12C) inhibitor AMG 510 drives anti-tumour immunity. Nature 2019; 575: 217-223.
23.
Kettle JG, Cassar DJ. Covalent inhibitors of the GTPase KRAS(G12C): a review of the patent literature. Expert Opin Ther Pat 2020; 30: 103-120.
24.
Zhang J, Fujimoto J, Wedge DC, et al. Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing. Science 2014; 346: 256-259.
25.
Hu Y, Ulrich BC, Supplee J, et al. False-Positive Plasma Genotyping.
26.
Due to Clonal Hematopoiesis. Clin Cancer Res 2018; 24: 4437-4443.
27.
Tseng LH, De Marchi F, Pallavajjalla A, et al. Clinical Validation of Discordant Trunk Driver Mutations in Paired Primary and Metastatic Lung Cancer Specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2019; 152: 570-581.
28.
Dong ZY, Zhong WZ, Zhang XC, et al. Potential Predictive Value of TP53 and KRAS Mutation Status for Response to PD-1 Blockade Immunotherapy in Lung Adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2017; 23: 3012-3024.
29.
Wang S, Jiang M, Yang Z, et. al. The role of distinct co-mutation patterns with TP53 mutation in immunotherapy for NSCLC. Genes & Diseases 2020; doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2020.04.001.