ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Preparation of frozen cell-block sections amenableto diagnostic immunocytochemistry: a technical report on cryo-embedded cell-block method
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Pathology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea
2
Department of Pathology, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Submission date: 2020-05-03
Acceptance date: 2020-06-13
Publication date: 2020-07-21
Pol J Pathol 2020;71(2):146-154
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Modified agarose cell-block (CB) technique can be effectively used to have the CB embedded in the OCT compound for the preparation of frozen CB (F-CB) sections in the same way as in the preparation of frozen sections from cryoembedded fresh tissue samples for the intraoperative consultation. In this report, we demonstrate the amenability of F-CB sections to the diagnostic immunocytochemistry. The pelleted cytologic material was at first compactly embedded in ultralow-gelling temperature agarose gel and then re-embedded in conventional agarose gel. The resulting agarose-embedded cell-pellet was cut in halves so that one half is embedded in OCT compound for cryosectioning on a cryostat, while the other half is reserved for the preparation of paraffin-embedded CB (P-CB). The F-CB sections were comparable to sections cut from the paraffin-embedded CB in terms of the quality of H&E-staining and immunocytochemistry. We suppose this method can also facilitate a rapid quantitative and qualitative assessment of the future P-CB.
We have extended this technique to the cryo-embedded cell-block method, in which the compact agarose cell pellet is directly embedded in the OCT compound so that the frozen sections can be cut from the cryo-embedded cell block in the same way as in intraoperative frozen section analysis. In this technical report, we illustrate how the frozen cell blocks (F-CBs) can be effectively prepared not only from liquid-based cytology samples but also from conventional fine-needle aspiration cytology slides.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Crapanzano JP, Heymann JJ, Monaco S, et al. The state of cell block variation and satisfaction in the era of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Cytojournal 2014; 11: 7.
2.
Saqi A. The state of cell blocks and ancillary testing: past, present, and future. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140: 1318-1322.
3.
Jain D, Mathur S, Iyer V. Cell blocks in cytopathology: a review of preparative methods, utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 356-371.
4.
Rekhtman N, Buonocore DJ, Rudomina D, et al. Novel Modification of HistoGel-Based Cell Block Preparation Method: Improved Sufficiency for Molecular Studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142: 529-535.
5.
Choi SJ, Choi YI, Kim L, et al. Preparation of compact agarose cell blocks from the residues of liquid-based cytology samples. Korean J Pathol 2014; 48: 351-360.
6.
Choi YI, Jakhongir M, Choi SJ, et al. High-quality cell block preparation from scraping of conventional cytology slide: a technical report on a modified cytoscrape cell block technique. Malays J Pathol 2016; 38: 295-304.
7.
Collins BT, Garcia TC, Hudson JB. Effective clinical practices for improved FNA biopsy cell block outcomes. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 123: 540-547.
8.
Lee Js, Choi Sj, Kim L, et al. Preparation of high-quality cell block frozen sections from clinical cytologic samples: a technical report. Proceedings of the 17th Annual Korea-Japan Joint Meeting for Diagnostic Cytopathology 2018 2018; 92.
9.
Zhu S, Schuerch C, Hunt J. Review and updates of immunohistochemistry in selected salivary gland and head and neck tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015; 139: 55-66.
10.
Schwartz LE, Begum S, Westra WH, Bishop JA. GATA3 immunohistochemical expression in salivary gland neoplasms. Head Neck Pathol 2013; 7: 311-315.
11.
Yang GC, Wan LS, Papellas J, et al. Compact cell blocks. Use for body fluids, fine needle aspirations and endometrial brush biopsies. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 703-706.
12.
Balassanian R, Wool GD, Ono JC, et al. A superior method for cell block preparation for fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cancer Cytopathol 2016; 124: 508-518.
13.
La Fortune KA, Randolph ML, Wu HH, et al. Improvements in cell block processing: The Cell-Gel method. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125: 267-276.
14.
Krogerus L, Kholová I. Cell Block in Cytological Diagnostics: Review of Preparatory Techniques. Acta Cytol 2018; 62: 237-243.
15.
Otali D, He Q, Grizzle WE. The effect of antigen retrieval on cells fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin followed by transfer to 70% ethanol. PLoS One 2013; 8: e82405.
16.
Morales AR, Essenfeld H, Essenfeld E, et al. Continuous-specimen-flow, high-throughput, 1-hour tissue processing. A system for rapid diagnostic tissue preparation. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002; 126: 583-590.
17.
Munkholm J, Talman ML, Hasselager T. Implementation of a new rapid tissue processing method--advantages and challenges. Pathol Res Pract 2008; 204: 899-904.
18.
Denda T, Kamoshida S, Kawamura J, et al. Rapid immunocytochemistry with simple heat-induced antigen retrieval technique for improvement in the quality of cytological diagnosis. J Histochem Cytochem 2013; 61: 920-930..
19.
Zhang X, Liu J, Yan X. Rapid intraoperative immunocytochemistry of central nervous system tumors. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2020; 13: 44-48.
20.
Collins BT, Garcia TC, Hudson JB. Rapid on-site evaluation improves fine-needle aspiration biopsy cell block quality. J Am Soc Cytopathol 2016; 5: 37-42.
21.
Shield PW, Cosier J, Ellerby G, et al. Rapid on-site evaluation of fine needle aspiration specimens by cytology scientists: a review of 3032 specimens. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 322-329.
22.
Agarwal P, Toi PC, Subramaniam H, et al. Prospective comparison of cytological specimen adequacy assessment by different rapid staining techniques for rapid on-site evaluation in fine needle aspiration cytology and their cost-effectiveness. Diagn Cytopathol 2019; 47: 469-474.
23.
Collins JA, Novak A, Ali SZ, Olson MT. Cytotechnologists and on-site evaluation of adequacy. Korean J Pathol 2013; 47: 405-410.