REVIEW ARTICLE
Review on significance of GDNF, PTCH1 and RNF213 in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma illustrated by the case of 71-years-old man
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Holy Cross Oncology Centre, Kielce, Poland
2
Division of Medical Biology, Institute of Biology, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
3
Department of Tumour Pathology, National Research Institute of Oncology, Krakow Branch, Krakow, Poland
4
Specialist Medical Practice – Pathologist, Kielce, Poland
5
Department of Urology, John Paul II Hospital, Independent Public Health Care Unit in Kolbuszowa, Poland
6
Department of Pathology, Holy Cross Oncology Centre, Kielce, Poland
7
Department of Clinical Oncology, Jan Kochanowski University, Holy Cross Oncology Centre, Kielce, Poland
8
Department of Prophylaxis and Cancer Epidemiology, Collegium Medicum, Jan Kochanowski University, Kielce, Poland
9
Department of General Pathomorphology, Collegium Pathologicum, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
Submission date: 2019-06-11
Final revision date: 2019-09-02
Acceptance date: 2019-10-15
Publication date: 2020-10-25
Pol J Pathol 2020;71(3):195-199
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Here we review the role of GDNF, PTCH1, RNF213 illustrated by a case of renal cell carcinoma, chromophobe type (pT2a 8th pTNM edition) of the left kidney of 71-year-old man. Status of potential hotspots in 409 tumor genes were studied by means of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology (IonTorrent –
Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) using Ion AmpliSeq™ Comprehensive Cancer Panel. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) revealed mutations of GDNF (NM_001190468: c. 328C>T, p.R110W, allelic frequency 46%), PTCH1 (NM_001083607:c. 2969C<T, p.A990V, allelic frequency 7%) RNF213 (NM_001256071: c.6967C<T, p.Q2323X, allelic frequency 7%). Our findings in relation to concise description of significance of GDNF, PTCH1, RNF213 supplement molecular characterization in area of gene profiling of renal cell carcinoma, chromophobe type, which is going to certainly deepen our knowledge on hazards in development of this peculiar kind of renal cancer.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Hes O, Petersson F, Kuroda N, et al. Renal hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumors – a review. Histol Histopathol 2013; 28: 1257-1264.
2.
Zhao W, Tian B, Wu C, et al. DOG1, cyclin D1, CK7, CD117 and vimentin are useful immunohistochemical markers in distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from clear cell renal cell carcinoma and renal oncocytoma. Pathol Res Pract 2015; 211: 303-307.
3.
Lin ZH, Han EM, Lee ES, et al. A distinct expression pattern and point mutation of c-kit in papillary renal cell carcinomas. Mod Pathol 2004; 17: 611-616.
4.
Liu Q, Cornejo KM, Cheng L, et al. Next-generation sequencing to detect deletion of RB1 and ERBB4 genes in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a potential role in distinguishing chromophobe renal cell carcinoma from renal oncocytoma. Am J Pathol 2018; 188: 846-852.
5.
Kopanos C, Tsiolkas V, Kouris A, et al. VarSome: The human genomic variant search engine. bioinformatics 2018; 35: 1978-1980.
6.
Fielder GC, Yang TW, Razdan M, et al. The GDNF family: a role in cancer? Neoplasia 2018; 20: 99-117.
7.
Costantini F, Shakya R. GDNF/Ret signaling and the development of the kidney. Bioessays 2006; 28: 117-127.
8.
Pichel JG, Shen L, Sheng HZ, et al. Defects in enteric innervation and kidney development in mice lacking GDNF. Nature 1996; 382: 73-76.
9.
Kim D, Dressler GR. PTEN modulates GDNF/RET mediated chemotaxis and branching morphogenesis in the developing kidney. Dev Biol 2007; 307: 290-299.
10.
Kurtzeborn K, Cebrian C, Kuure S. Regulation of renal differentiation by trophic factors. Front Physiol 2018; 9: 1588.
11.
Briscoe J, Thérond PP. The mechanisms of Hedgehog signalling and its roles in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2013; 14: 416-429.
12.
Pasca di Magliano M, Hebrok M. Hedgehog signalling in cancer formation and maintenance. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3: 903-911.
13.
Hanna A, Shevde LA. Hedgehog signaling: modulation of cancer properies and tumor mircroenvironment. Mol Cancer 2016; 15: 24.
14.
Wu F, Zhang Y, Sun B, et al. Hedgehog signaling: from basic biology to cancer therapy. Cell Chem Biol 2017; 24: 252-280.
15.
Jäger W, Thomas C, Fazli L, et al. DHH is an independent prognosticator of oncologic outcome of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2014; 192: 1842-1848.
16.
Scholz B, Korn C, Wojtarowicz J, et al. Endothelial RSPO3 controls vascular stability and pruning through non-canonical WNT/Ca(2+)/NFAT signaling. Dev Cell 2016; 36: 79-93.
17.
Li X, Xu W, Kang W, et al. Genomic analysis of liver cancer unveils novel driver genes and distinct prognostic features. Theranostics 2018; 8: 1740-1751.
18.
van der Krogt JA, Bempt MV, Ferreiro JF, et al. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive anaplastic large cell lymphoma with the variant RNF213-, ATIC- and TPM3-ALK fusions is characterized by copy number gain of the rearranged ALK gene. Haematologica 2017; 102: 1605-1616.
19.
Ohkubo K, Sakai Y, Inoue H, et al. Moyamoya disease susceptibility gene RNF213 links inflammatory and angiogenic signals in endothelial cells. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 13191.
20.
Banh RS, Iorio C, Marcotte R, et al. PTP1B controls non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption by regulating RNF213 to promote tumour survival during hypoxia. Nat Cell Biol 2016; 18: 803-813.
21.
Borys AM, Seweryn M, Go³¹bek T, et al. Patterns of gene expression characterize T1 and T3 clear cell renal cell carcinoma subtypes. PLoS One 2019; 14: e0216793.