ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A new laboratory device with mathematically based positioning of a frozen tissue block facilitating precise sectioning of large specimens
 
More details
Hide details
 
Submission date: 2016-03-30
 
 
Acceptance date: 2016-04-06
 
 
Publication date: 2016-08-02
 
 
Pol J Pathol 2016;67(2):151-155
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a treatment method aiming at thorough, personalized eradication of skin cancers by mean of staged excision of tissues surrounding the tumor with complete (100%) histopathological examination of their margins. In many MMS laboratories, the excised tissue is divided, shaped, frozen in a cryostat with a heat extractor and positioned manually (with the block on the object disc) in an articulated cryostat chuck during cutting. However, these activities may be difficult, time-consuming and associated with the risk of imprecise tissue sectioning.
Development of a laboratory device allowing for processing of large tissue specimens, with the function of mechanical, mathematically steered positioning of the tissue block surface directly to the microtome knife cutting place, eliminating the need for manual adjustment.
The prototype device was designed and manufactured. Its functioning was tested on 513 histological slides produced during 212 operations of skin cancers using MMS. The depth of the first complete sections and the diameter of sections were measured.
Complete sections were obtained at an average depth of 81.60 m (min. 20 m, max. 180 m, SD = 29.15), whereas the average diameter of sections was 18.11 mm
(min. 4 mm, max. 42 mm, SD = 9.10).
The histological processing of large specimens with mathematically based positioning of the tissue surface in relation to the cryotome knife cutting plane is precise, fast and easy. The device can be useful in those MMS centers which continue to employ manual setting of the cryostat chuck or share the cryostat with other users, which prevents fixing the chuck position (including large hospital settings). It may also be helpful in centers using a cryostat with a fixed chuck, for the correction of minimal inaccuracies of its preset position.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Dogan MM, Snow SN, Lo J. Rapid skin edge elevation using the OCT compound droplet technique to obtain horizontal microsections in Mohs micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1991; 17: 857-860.
 
2.
Selak LS. The Mohs Laboratory. In: Mikhail G (ed.). Mohs micrographic surgery. Saunders Phildelphia 1991; 299-308.
 
3.
Yob EH. Cryostat and cryostat technique: Obtaining Quality Mohs Slides. In: Gross KG, Steinmann HK, Rapini RP (eds.). Mohs Surgery: Fundamentals and Techniques. Mosby, St Louis, Baltimore Boston 1998.
 
4.
Miller LJ, Argenyi ZB, Whitaker DC. The preparation of frozen sections for Mohs micrographic surgery. A review of current metodology. J Dematol Surg Oncol 1993; 19: 1023-1029.
 
5.
Silapunt S, Peterson R, Alcalay J, Goldberg LH. Mohs tissue mapping and processing: a survey study. Dermatol Surg 2003; 29: 1109-1112.
 
6.
Hanke CW, Leonard AL, Reed AJ. Rapid preparation of high quality frozen sections using a membrane and vacuum system embedding machine. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34: 20-25.
 
7.
Hanke CW, Lee MW. Cryostat use and tissue processing in Mohs micrographic surgery. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1989; 15: 29-32.
 
8.
Carter VH. A new method for preparing tissue blocks for cryostat sectioning. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1985; 11: 687-689.
 
9.
Gormley DE. Evaluation of a method for controlled tissue embedding for histologic evaluation of tumor margins. Am.
 
10.
J Dermatopathol 1987; 9: 308-315.
 
11.
Koehn GG. A new modification for preparing tissue blocks for cryostat sectioning. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1992; 18: 485-486.
 
12.
Motley RJ, Holt PJ. A simple device for optimal tissue preparation for Mohs micrographic surgery. Br J Dermatol 1992; 126: 57-59.
 
13.
Marini L. Cryosystem: a new, complete device for tissue processing in micrographic surgery. J Eur Acad Dermat Venereol 1995; Supl. 1: 117.
 
14.
Franks JW. A precision machine for mounting tissues for Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg 1998; 24: 989-993.
 
15.
Peters S. The Art of Embedding Tissue for Frozen Section, in: Stephen R. Peters (ed): A Practical Guide to Frozen Section Technique. Springer-Science+ Business Media, Pathology Innovations LLC 2010 [http://www.leicabiosystems.com...].
 
16.
Tulli A. Mohs’ micrographic surgery. In: Chu AC, Edelson RL (eds.). Malignant Tumors of the Skin. Oxford University Press, London, UK 1999; 381-395.
 
17.
Rapini RP. Pitfalls of Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 1990; 22: 681-686.
 
18.
Soo Hoo W, Ruebner B, Vogt P, Wiese D. Orientation of small, flat, frozen-section specimens. Am J Surg Pathol 1988; 12: 573-574.
 
19.
Randle HW, Zitelli J, Brodland DG, Roenigk RK. Histologic preparation for Mohs micrographic surgery. The single section method. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1993; 19: 522-524.
 
20.
Sukal SA, Tudisco M, Strippoli B, Nehal KS. Innovative laboratory techniques to facilitate processing of large Mohs cases. Dermatol Surg 2005; 31: 763-765.
 
21.
Gloster HM. Surgical pearl: Large single sections in Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 506-508.
 
22.
Ellis JI, Khrom T, Wong A, et al. Mohs math-where the error hides. BMC Dermatol 2006; 6: 10.
 
eISSN:2084-9869
ISSN:1233-9687
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top