ORIGINAL ARTICLE
A novel pre-processing approach based on colour space assessment for digestive neuroendocrine tumour grading in immunohistochemical tissue images
,
 
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Research Laboratory of Biophysics and Medical Technologies, The Higher Institute of Medical Technologies of Tunis, University of Tunis el Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
 
2
Laboratory of Signal Image and Energy Mastery, National Higher School of Engineers of Tunis, Tunis University, Tunis, Tunisia
 
3
IMT Atlantique, LaTIM UMR 1101, UBL, Brest, France
 
4
Pathology Anatomy and Cytology Service, Salah Azaiez Institute, University of Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia
 
 
Submission date: 2022-01-05
 
 
Final revision date: 2022-07-09
 
 
Acceptance date: 2022-08-18
 
 
Publication date: 2022-09-28
 
 
Pol J Pathol 2022;73(2):134-158
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
The complexity of histopathological images remains a challenging issue in cancer diagnosis. A pathologist analyses immunohistochemical images to detect a colour-based stain, which is brown for positive nuclei with different intensities and blue for negative nuclei. Several issues emerge during the eyeballing tissue slide analysis, such as colour variations caused by stain inhomogeneity, non-uniform illumination, irregular cell shapes, and overlapping cell nuclei. To overcome those problems, an automated computer-aided diagnosis system is proposed to segment and quantify digestive neuroendocrine tumours.

Material and methods:
We present a novel pre-processing approach based on colour space assessment. A criterion called pertinence degree is introduced to select the appropriate colour channel, followed by contrast enhancement. Subsequently, the adaptive local threshold technique that uses the modified Laplacian filter is applied to minimize the implementation complexity, highlight edges, and emphasize intensity variation between cells across the slide. Finally, the improved watershed algorithm based on the concave vertex graph is applied for cell separation.

Results:
The performance of the algorithms for nucleus segmentation is evaluated according to both the object-level and pixel-level criteria. Our approach increases segmentation accuracy, with the F1-score equal to 0.986. There is significant agreement between the applied approach and the expert’s ground truth segmentation.

Conclusions:
The proposed method outperformed the state-of-the-art techniques based on recall, precision, the F1-score, and the Dice coefficient.
REFERENCES (43)
1.
Bellizzi M. Immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis and classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms: what can brown do for you? Hum Pathol 2020; 96: 8‑33.
 
2.
Sobecki M, Mrouj K, Camasses A, et al. The cell proliferation antigen Ki-67 organises heterochromatin. Elife 2016; 5: e13722.
 
3.
Al-Lahham HZ, Alomari RS, Hiary H, et al. Automating proliferation rate estimation from Ki-67 histology images. Med Imaging 2012; 8315,: 669‑675.
 
4.
Roszkowiak L, Korzynska A, Siemion K, et al. System for quantitative evaluation of DAB&H-stained breast cancer biopsy digital images (CHISEL). Sci Rep 2021; 11: 9291.
 
5.
Gomolka RS, Korzynska A, Siemion K, et al. Automatic method for assessment of proliferation index in digital images of DLBCL tissue section. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2019; 39: 30‑37.
 
6.
Ghane N, Vard A, Talebi A, et al. Segmentation of white blood cells from microscopic images using a novel combination of k-means clustering and modified watershed algorithm. J Med Signals Sens 2017; 7: 92‑101.
 
7.
Rahman TY, Mahanta LB, Choudhury H, et al. Study of morphological and textural features for classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma by traditional machine learning techniques. Cancer Rep 2020; 3: e1293.
 
8.
Kim YJ, Romeike BFM, Uszkoreit J, et al. Automated nuclear segmentation in the determination of the Ki-67 labeling index in meningiomas. Clin Neuropathol 2006; 25: 67‑73.
 
9.
Adams R, Bischof L. Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell 1994; 16: 641‑647.
 
10.
Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall 2002.
 
11.
Hameed KAS, Banumathi A, Ulaganathan G. Performance evaluation of maximal separation techniques in immunohistochemical scoring of tissue images. Micron 2015; 79: 29‑35.
 
12.
Boykov Y, Funka-Lea G. Graph Cuts and Efficient N-D Image Segmentation. Int J Comput Vis 2006; 70: 109‑131.
 
13.
Luck L, Carlson KD, Bovik AC, Richards-Kortum RR. An image model and segmentation algorithm for reflectance confocal images of in vivo cervical tissue. IEEE Trans Image Process 2005; 14: 1265‑1276.
 
14.
Masmoudi H, Hewitt SM, Petrick N, Myers KJ, Gavrieli- des MA. Automated quantitative assessment of HER-2/neu immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009; 28: 916‑925.
 
15.
Naik S, Doyle S, Agner S, Madabhushi A, Feldman M, Tomaszewski J. Automated gland and nuclei segmentation for grading of prostate and breast cancer histopathology. IEEE Inter Symposium Biomed Imaging 2008; 284‑287.
 
16.
Veta M, van Diest PJ, Kornegoor R, Huisman A, Viergever MA, Pluim JPW. Automatic nuclei segmentation in H&E stained breast cancer histopathology images. PLoS One 2013; 8: e70221.
 
17.
Vincent L, Soille P. Watersheds in digital spaces: an efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1991; 13: 583‑598.
 
18.
Shu J, Liu J, Zhang Y, et al. Marker controlled superpixel nuclei segmentation and automatic counting on immunohistochemistry staining images. Bioinformatics 2020; 36: 3225‑3233.
 
19.
Veta M, Huisman A, Viergever MA, van Diest PJ, Pluim JPW. Marker-controlled watershed segmentation of nuclei in H&E stained breast cancer biopsy images. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2011; 618‑621.
 
20.
Lin G, Adiga U, Olson K, Guzowski JF, Barnes CA, Roysam B. A hybrid 3D watershed algorithm incorporating gradient cues and object models for automatic segmentation of nuclei in confocal image stacks. Cytom Part J Int Soc Anal Cytol; 2003; 56: 23‑36.
 
21.
Al-Jaboriy SS, Sjarif NNA, Chuprat S, Abduallah WM. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia segmentation using local pixel information. Pattern Recognit Lett 2019; 125: 85‑90.
 
22.
Laosai J, Chamnongthai K. Classification of acute leukemia using medical-knowledge-based morphology and CD marker. Biomed Signal Process Control 2018; 44: 127‑137.
 
23.
Bai X, Sun C, Zhou F. Splitting touching cells based on concave points and ellipse fitting. Pattern Recognit 2009; 42: 2434‑2446.
 
24.
Aresta G, Araújo T, Kwok S, et al. BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images. Med Image Anal 2019; 56: 122‑139.
 
25.
Rmili H, Solaiman B, Mouelhi A, Doghri R, Labidi S. Nuclei segmentation approach for digestive neuroendocrine tumors analysis using optimized color space conversion. 5th International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP) 2020; 1‑6.
 
26.
Dundar MM, Badve S, Bilgin G, et al. Computerized classification of intraductal breast lesions using histopathological images. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58; 1977‑1984.
 
27.
Roszkowiak L, Zak J, Siemion K, Pijanowska D, Korzynska A. Nuclei detection with local threshold processing in DAB&H stained breast cancer biopsy images. Computer Vision and Graphics, Cham 2020; 164‑175.
 
28.
Di Ruberto C, Puztu L. White blood cells identification and counting from microscopic blood image. Int J Med Health Biomed Pharm Eng 2013; 7: 15‑22.
 
29.
Rogalsky JE, Ioshii SO, de Oliveira LF. Automatic ER and PR scoring in Immunohistochemistry H-DAB breast cancer images. Anais do Simpósio Brasileiro de Computação Aplicada à Saúde (SBCAS) 2021; 313‑322.
 
30.
Huang DC, Hung KD, Chan YK. A computer assisted method for leukocyte nucleus segmentation and recognition in blood smear images. J Syst Softw 2012; 85: 2104‑2118.
 
31.
Singhal V, Singh P. Local binary pattern for automatic detection of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. 2014 Twentieth National Conference on Communications (NCC) 2014; 1‑5.
 
32.
Lezoray O. Segmentation d’images par morphologie mathématique et classification de données par réseaux de neurones: application à la classification de cellules en cytologie des séreuses. Université de Caen Basse-Normandie 2000.
 
33.
Haralick RM, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Textural features for image classification. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 1973; SMC-3: 610‑621.
 
34.
Alsubaie N, Trahearn N, Raza SEA, Snead D, Rajpoot NM. Stain deconvolution using statistical analysis of multi-resolution stain colour representation. Plos One 2017; 12: e0169875.
 
35.
Roy S, Kumar Jain A, Lal S, Kini J. A study about color normalization methods for histopathology images. Micron 2018; 114: 42‑61.
 
36.
Dzulkifli FA. Identification of suitable contrast enhancement technique for improving the quality of astrocytoma histopathological images. ELCVIA Electron Lett Comput Vis Image Anal 2021; 20: 84-98.
 
37.
Sayadi MM, Fnaiech F. A novel morphological segmentation method for evaluating estrogen receptors’ status in breast tissue images. 1st International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing (ATSIP) 2014; 177‑182.
 
38.
Mouelhi H, Rmili JB, Ali M, Sayadi R, Doghri, Mrad K. Fast unsupervised nuclear segmentation and classification scheme for automatic allred cancer scoring in immunohistochemical breast tissue images. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2018; 165: 37‑51.
 
39.
Mohapatra S, Patra D, Satpathy S. An ensemble classifier system for early diagnosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in blood microscopic images. Neural Comput Appl 2014; 24: 1887‑1904.
 
40.
Fatonah N, Tjandrasa H, Fatichah C. Identification of acute lymphoblastic leukemia subtypes in touching cells based on enhanced edge detection. Int J Intell Eng Syst 2020; 13: 204‑215.
 
41.
Roszkowiak L, Korzynska A, Pijanowska D, Bosch R, Lejeune M, Lopez C. Clustered nuclei splitting based on recurrent distance transform in digital pathology images. EURASIP J Image Video Process 2020; 2020: 26.
 
42.
Mouelhi M, Sayadi F, Fnaiech F, Mrad K, Romdhane KB. A new automatic image analysis method for assessing estrogen receptors’ status in breast tissue specimens. Comput Biol Med 2013; 43: 2263‑2277.
 
43.
Cui Y, Zhang G, Liu Z, Xiong Z, Hu J. A deep learning algorithm for one-step contour aware nuclei segmentation of histopathology images. Med Biol Eng Comput 2019; 57: 2027‑2043.
 
eISSN:2084-9869
ISSN:1233-9687
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top