ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Figure from article: Extramural venous invasion...
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a key determinant of prognosis and treatment decisions in colon adenocarcinoma. Among histopathological features associated with tumor aggressiveness, extramural venous invasion (EMVI) has been increasingly recognized as an adverse factor; however, its independent role in predicting nodal metastasis remains incompletely defined.

Material and Methods:
In this retrospective study, 180 consecutive patients who underwent primary surgical resection for colon adenocarcinoma, excluding rectal tumors, neoadjuvant-treated cases, and histological subtypes other than adenocarcinoma NOS, were evaluated. Histopathological parameters, including EMVI, intramural venous invasion, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), perineural invasion (PNI), tumor budding, and tumor deposits, were systematically reviewed, and elastic staining was used in equivocal cases. Associations with LNM were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression.

Results:
Lymph node metastasis was identified in 47.8% of patients, and EMVI was present in 21.7% and was significantly more frequent in patients with nodal metastasis. In multivariate analysis, LVI was the strongest independent predictor of LNM, followed by PNI, EMVI, and high tumor budding. The model demonstrated good calibration and an overall accuracy of 80%.

Conclusions:
Extramural venous invasion is an independent predictor of LNM and reflects a biologically aggressive tumor phenotype. Its routine assessment, together with other high-risk features, may improve risk stratification and support more informed clinical decision-making.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Betge J, Pollheimer MJ, Lindtner RA, Kornprat P, Schlemmer A, Rehak P, et al. Intramural and extramural vascular invasion in colorectal cancer: prognostic significance and quality of pathology reporting. Cancer 2012; 118: 628-638.
 
2.
Parnaby CN, Scott NW, Ramsay G, MacKay C, Samuel L, Murray GI, et al. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio and extramural vascular invasion on survival for patients undergoing curative colon cancer resection. Br J Cancer 2015; 113: 212-219.
 
3.
Messenger DE, Driman DK, McLeod RS, Riddell RH, Kirsch R. Current practice patterns among pathologists in the assessment of venous invasion in colorectal cancer. J Clin Pathol 2011; 64: 983-989.
 
4.
Roxburgh CS, McMillan DC, Anderson JH, McKee RF, Horgan PG, Foulis AK. Elastica staining for venous invasion results in superior prediction of cancer-specific survival in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 252: 989-997.
 
5.
Messenger DE, Driman DK, Kirsch R. Developments in the assessment of venous invasion in colorectal cancer: implications for future practice and patient outcome. Hum Pathol 2012; 43: 965-973.
 
6.
Loughrey MB, Webster F, Arends MJ, Brown I, Burgart LJ, Cunningham C, et al. Dataset for pathology reporting of colorectal cancer: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Ann Surg 2022; 275: e549-e561.
 
7.
Shin YM, Pyo JS, Park MJ. The impact of extramural venous invasion in colorectal cancer: a detailed analysis based on tumor location and evaluation methods. Int J Surg Pathol 2020; 28: 120-127.
 
8.
Fei LYN, Patel SV, Popa T, Boudreau L, Caycedo-Marulanda A, Grin A, et al. Venous invasion detectable only by elastic stain shows weak prognostic value in colon cancer. Histopathology 2024; 84: 1038-1046.
 
9.
Djuric M, Kožik B, Vasiljevic T, Djermanovic A, Stanulovic N, Djuric M. Prognostic value of separate extramural vascular invasion reporting in operative samples of rectal cancer: single institutional experience. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16: 3579.
 
10.
Sari A, Cyr DP, Pun C, Shivji S, Ng D, Duan K, et al. Multifocal extramural venous invasion is a powerful predictor of adverse oncological outcomes in stages I–III colorectal cancer. Histopathology 2026; 88: 457-470.
 
11.
Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Springer 2017.
 
12.
WHO classification of tumours editorial board. digestive system tumours. 5th ed. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon 2019.
 
13.
Lugli A, Kirsch R, Ajioka Y, Bosman F, Cathomas G, Dawson H, et al. Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016. Mod Pathol 2017; 30: 1299-1311.
 
14.
Leijssen LG, Dinaux AM, Amri R, Taylor MS, Deshpande V, Bordeianou LG, et al. Impact of intramural and extramural vascular invasion on stage II–III colon cancer outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2019; 119: 749-757.
 
15.
Gao Z, Cao H, Xu X, Wang Q, Wu Y, Lu Q. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in stage II colorectal cancer patients with an inadequate examination of lymph nodes. World J Surg Oncol 2021; 19: 125.
 
16.
Lim SB, Yu CS, Jang SJ, Kim TW, Kim JH, Kim JC. Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in sporadic colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 377-384.
 
17.
Lee H, Yoo SY, Park IJ, Hong SM, Lim SB, Yu CS, et al. The prognostic reliability of lymphovascular invasion for patients with T3N0 colorectal cancer in adjuvant chemotherapy decision making. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14: 2833.
 
18.
Knijn N, Mogk SC, Teerenstra S, Simmer F, Nagtegaal ID. Perineural invasion is a strong prognostic factor in colorectal cancer: a systematic review. Am J Surg Pathol 2016; 40: 103-112.
 
19.
Liebig C, Ayala G, Wilks J, Verstovsek G, Liu H, Agarwal N, et al. Perineural invasion is an independent predictor of outcome in colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5131-5137.
 
20.
Kilic O, Gultekin Y, Biri I, Yilmaz AU. The prognostic factors on survival rates for patients with stage II–III colon cancer. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2021; 31: 122-129.
 
21.
Yüksel C, Çulcu S, Gojayev A, Demirci S, Ünal AE. Prognostic value of lymphovascular and perineural invasion in colon cancer. Acta Haematol Oncol Turc 2021; 54: 166-174.
 
22.
Bilić Z, Zovak M, Glavčić G, Mužina D, Ibukić A, Košec A, et al. The relationship between tumor budding and tumor deposits in patients with stage III colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Med 2024; 13: 2583.
 
23.
Delattre JF, Erdogan ASO, Cohen R, Shi Q, Emile JF, Taieb J, et al. A comprehensive overview of tumour deposits in colorectal cancer: towards a next TNM classification. Cancer Treat Rev 2022; 103: 102325.
 
24.
Alonso MD, Moreno FM, Mansilla CV, Matías B, Jimenez R, Allaoua Y, et al. Prognostic value of tumor deposits in patients with colorectal cancer. J Cancer 2024; 15: 4789.
 
25.
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, et al. Colon cancer, version 2.2021, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19: 329-359.
 
26.
Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, et al. Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2020; 31: 1291-1305.
 
27.
Baxter NN, Kennedy EB, Bergsland E, Berlin J, George TJ, Gill S, et al. Adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40: 892-910.
 
eISSN:2084-9869
ISSN:1233-9687
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top