ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Mast cells influence neoangiogenesis in prostatic cancer independently of ERG status
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum of the Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
2
Department of Urology, Collegium Medicum of the Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
Submission date: 2016-05-16
Acceptance date: 2016-05-18
Publication date: 2016-11-25
Corresponding author
Krzysztof Okoń
Department of Pathomorphology
Collegium Medicum of the Jagiellonian University
Grzegórzecka 16
31-531 Krakow, Poland
Pol J Pathol 2016;67(3):244-249
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
A significant proportion of prostatic adenocarcinomas show recurrent translocation leading to ERG expression. Previously we found that ERG+ cases have higher microvessel density than negative ones. One factor influencing angiogenesis in cancer is mast cells. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the relationship between microvessels, mast cells and ERG status.
Tissue microarrays prepared from 113 radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed with immunohistochemistry for CD31, tryptase and chymase. Vascular profiles and tryptase-positive and chymase-positive cells were counted.
The average number of tryptase-positive cells was 28.93/mm2 and chymase-positive cells 9.91/mm2. The average number of CD31+ vascular profiles was 352.66/mm2. The average number of tryptase-positive cells was 26.35/mm2 for ERG– cases and 32.12/mm2 for ERG+ cases. The average number of chymase-positive cells was 8.14/mm2 for ERG– cases and 12.06/mm2 for ERG+ cases. The average number of CD31+ vascular profiles was 321.34/mm2 for ERG– cases and 390.74/mm2 for ERG+ cases. The number of CD31+ vascular profiles was positively correlated with the number of tryptase-positive and chymase-positive cells (R = 0.26 and R = 0.20).
In summary, we demonstrated an interrelationship between mast cells, microvascular density and ERG status in prostatic carcinoma.
REFERENCES (27)
1.
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69-90.
2.
Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J Clin 2013; 63: 11-30.
3.
Tomlins SA, Rhodes DR, Perner S, et al. Recurrent fusion of TMPRSS2 and ETS transcription factor genes in prostate cancer. Science 2005; 310: 644-648.
4.
Park K, Tomlins SA, Mudaliar KM, et al. Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangement-positive prostate cancer. Neoplasia 2010, 12: 590-595.
5.
Kaczmarczyk K, Dyduch G, Bialas M, et al. Frequency of ERG-positive prostate carcinoma in Poland. Pol J Pathol 2013; 64: 175-179.
6.
Strzepek A, Kaczmarczyk K, Bialas M, et al. ERG positive prostatic cancer may show a more angiogenetic phenotype. Pathol Res Pract 2014; 210: 897-900.
7.
Carlini MJ, Dalurzo MC, Lastiri JM, et al. Mast cell phenotypes and microvessels in non-small cell lung cancer and its prognostic significance. Hum Pathol 2010; 41: 697-705.
8.
Sari A, Calli A, Cakalagaoglu F, et al. Association of mast cells with microvessel density in urothelial carcinomas of the urinary bladder. Ann Diagn Pathol 2012; 16: 1-6.
9.
Mohseni MG, Mohammadi A, Heshmat AS, et al. The lack of correlation between mast cells and microvessel density with pathologic feature of renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 2010; 42: 109-112.
10.
Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Jr., Amin MB, et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am.
11.
J Surg Pathol 2005; 29: 1228-1242.
12.
Fine SW, Amin MB, Berney DM, et al. A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 20-39.
13.
Epstein JI, Egevad L, Amin MB, et al. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma: definition of grading patterns and proposal for a new grading system. Am J Surg Pathol 2015; 40: 244-252.
14.
Dyduch G, Kaczmarczyk K, Okon K. Mast cells and cancer: enemies or allies? Pol J Pathol 2012; 63: 1-7.
15.
Ribatti D, Crivellato E. Mast cells, angiogenesis, and tumour growth. Biochim Biophys Acta 2012, 1822: 2-8.
16.
Taverna G, Giusti G, Seveso M, et al. Mast cells as a potential prognostic marker in prostate cancer. Dis Markers 2013; 35: 711-720.
17.
Aydin O, Dusmez D, Cinel L, et al. Immunohistological analysis of mast cell numbers in the intratumoral and peritumoral regions of prostate carcinoma compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Pathol Res Pract 2002; 198: 267-271.
18.
Stawerski P, Wagrowska-Danilewicz M, Stasikowska-Kanicka O, et al. Augmented mast cell infiltration and microvessel density in prostate cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2013; 17: 378-382.
19.
Colombo MP, Pittoni P, Sangaletti S, et al. Dual role of mast cells in prostate tumors. Cancer Res 2013; 73: 2877-2877.
20.
Pittoni P, Tripodo C, Piconese S, et al. Mast cell targeting hampers prostate adenocarcinoma development but promotes the occurrence of highly malignant neuroendocrine cancers. Cancer Res 2011; 71: 5987-5997.
21.
Nonomura N, Takayama H, Nishimura K, et al. Decreased number of mast cells infiltrating into needle biopsy specimens leads to a better prognosis of prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 2007; 97: 952-956.
22.
Globa T, Saptefrti L, Ceausu RA, et al. Mast cell phenotype in benign and malignant tumors of the prostate. Pol J Pathol 2014; 65: 147-153.
23.
Johansson A, Rudolfsson S, Hammarsten P, et al. mast cells are novel independent prognostic markers in prostate cancer and represent a target for therapy. Am J Pathol 2010; 177: 1031-1041.
24.
Lu K, Liu C, Tao T, et al. MicroRNA-19a regulates proliferation and apoptosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells by targeting BTG1. FEBS Lett 2015; 589: 1485-1490.
25.
Li L, Qiang D, He D. Infiltrating mast cells enhance prostate cancer neuroendocrine differentiation via modulation of the androgen receptor-miRNA-32 signals. Int J Urol 2014; 21: A211-A211.
26.
Fleischmann A, Schlomm T, Koellermann J, et al. immunological microenvironment in prostate cancer: high mast cell densities are associated with favorable tumor characteristics and good prognosis. Prostate 2009; 69: 976-981.
27.
Xie H, Li C, Dang Q, et al. Infiltrating mast cells increase prostate cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy resistances via modulation of p38/p53/p21 and ATM signals. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 1341-1353.